Epic Associates 84-III, William C. Griffith, Jr. - Page 147




                                       - 74 -                                         
             down that business when interest rates increased in 1980                 
             because EPIC's management believed that the company could                
             purchase properties that would appreciate and could be sold              
             for a profit when interest rates declined.                               
                  At this time, EPIC's management undertook to revise                 
             certain characteristics of the limited partnerships that                 
             were syndicated.  EPIC's management had realized that if an              
             income partnership held properties after the developer's                 
             lease expired, the partnership would realize cash deficits,              
             and it had no mechanism to fund such deficits.  EPIC's                   
             management wanted greater flexibility in the period of time              
             that a partnership could hold its properties.  In order to               
             permit a longer holding period, the partnerships would have              
             to lease properties to individual tenants, and, as a                     
             result, the rental stream would decrease substantially                   
             because lease rates paid by individual tenants are much                  
             lower than the commercial rates paid by developers.                      
             However, EPIC found that developers would discount the                   
             price of the properties by an amount roughly equivalent                  
             to the present value of the difference in rental rates.                  
             EPIC referred to this discount as the rental deficit                     
             contribution.                                                            
                  Because of the longer holding period, EPIC's                        
             management also wanted to increase the loan-to-value ratio               






Page:  Previous  64  65  66  67  68  69  70  71  72  73  74  75  76  77  78  79  80  81  82  83  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011