James D. Fox - Page 3




               Respondent determined a deficiency in petitioner's Federal             
          income tax for 1996 of $10,351; and additions to tax under                  
          section 6651(a)(1) of $1,571.85, under section 6651(a)(2) of                
          $698.60, and under section 6654 of $356.05.                                 
               The parties agree that petitioner's income tax deficiency,             
          without taking into account respondent's assessment of tax                  
          subsequent to the mailing of the notice of deficiency on May 18,            
          1999, is $6,110, that respondent made an assessment of income tax           
          on May 29, 2000, of $2,599, and that petitioner's income tax                
          deficiency to be assessed is $3,511.  The parties also agree that           
          there is no addition to tax due from the petitioner under the               
          provisions of section 6654.                                                 
               The issues for decision are whether petitioner filed his               
          Federal income tax return timely and timely paid his income tax             
          due for 1996.                                                               
                                     Background                                       
               Some of the facts have been stipulated and are so found, and           
          the accompanying exhibits are incorporated herein by reference.             
          At the time the petition was filed, petitioner resided in                   
          Princeton, New Jersey.                                                      
               In his petition, with respect to his 1996 Federal income tax           
          return, petitioner alleges that "extension was file [sic]                   
          including $200 check, return was sent before 8/96".  In his trial           
          memorandum, petitioner alleges that he "filed a timely [1996]               








Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011