Estate of Hon Hing Fung, Deceased, Bernard Fung, Executor - Page 25




                                       - 25 -                                         
          Deductions                                                                  
          Expenses, claims, etc.                                                      
               amount allowed                                    1$258,944            
          Marital deduction                                                           
               Available amount attributable to each item of U.S. property            
               passing to surviving spouse                                            
                    Monte Vista         2$166,313                                     
                    Calle Victoria       3163,125                                     
                    Vernon               4197,743                                     
               Total                                   $527,181                       
               Less: Three-eighths share of                                           
                    taxes, debts, and expenses                                        
                    payable out of the residue         (217,293)                      
               Allowed marital deduction                         309,888              
          TOTAL DEDUCTIONS ALLOWED                               568,832              

          Taxable Estate                                                              
               Gross estate in United States           1,075,243                      
               Less: Deductions                         (568,832)                     
          TAXABLE ESTATE                                         5506,412             


               1 This amount takes into account one-half of the unpaid                
          balance on the Monte Vista mortgage, or $324,973, reduced in                
          accordance with the ratio of U.S. to total gross estate value.              
               2 It appears that this amount was likely intended to equal             
          three-eighths of the value of decedent’s one-half interest in the           
          parcel ($442,500 x .375 = $165,938 (rounded)).  The mathematical            
          discrepancy is not explained.                                               
               3 This amount equals three-eighths of the value of                     
          decedent’s one-half interest in the parcel ($435,000 x .375 =               
          $163,125).                                                                  
               4 This amount equals the full gross estate value of                    
          decedent’s interest in the parcel.  It would appear that no five-           
          eighths reduction was applied because the property passed to the            
          surviving spouse pursuant to the joint tenancy form of ownership,           
          as opposed to under the residuary clause of decedent’s will.                
               5 The $1 discrepancy ($1,075,243 - $568,832 = $506,411) is             
          not explained and presumably results from rounding.                         


Page:  Previous  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  16  17  18  19  20  21  22  23  24  25  

Last modified: May 25, 2011