- 9 - 1.6001-1(a), Income Tax Regs. Petitioner did not present any evidence to substantiate her claim to the deductions in question for either of the years at issue. Accordingly, we hold that petitioner is not entitled to them. Issue 3. Petitioner’s 1989 Overpayment The parties have agreed that petitioner’s withholdings exceeded her tax liability for 1989 by $3,441. Although petitioner did not request a refund or credit of this overpayment in the petition, we find that this issue was tried by consent under Rule 41(b) as respondent listed the overpayment dispute as an issue for trial in his pretrial memorandum. Respondent concedes that petitioner’s 1989 Federal income tax withholdings exceeded her tax liability by $3,441 but argues that this Court lacks jurisdiction to award a refund or credit of this overpayment because the period of limitations has expired. Generally, this Court has jurisdiction to award a refund or credit for overpayments of tax paid within one of two applicable look-back periods: (1) The 2 years before respondent issued the notice of deficiency, or (2) the 3 years before the taxpayer filed his or her return. Secs. 6511(b)(2), 6512(b)(3)(B); Commissioner v. Lundy, 516 U.S. 235, 241-242 (1996); Smathers v. Commissioner, T.C. Memo. 2000-113. In this case the 2-year look- back period applies because petitioner did not file a tax return before respondent issued the notice of deficiency. Commissioner v. Lundy, supra at 243. Thus we have jurisdiction to award aPage: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 Next
Last modified: May 25, 2011