- 7 - length of the civil and criminal examination process rather than at any particular error or act of delay committed by an IRS employee. The mere passage of time, however, does not establish error or delay in performing a ministerial act. Scott v. Commissioner, T.C. Memo. 2000-369; Hawksley v. Commissioner, T.C. Memo. 2000-354. Taking several years to complete an examination due to the use of third-party summonses made necessary by difficulties in obtaining documentation, and to the Commissioner's suspicion of fraud, does not prove erroneous or dilatory ministerial acts by respondent. Banat v. Commissioner, T.C. Memo. 2000-141. The Commissioner's decision not to proceed with the civil case during a criminal fraud investigation and prosecution is not a ministerial act. Taylor v. Commissioner, 113 T.C. 206 (1999). Petitioner did make an unfocused allegation that the revenue agent failed to return to him some records obtained during the civil examination. The revenue agent, however, testified that most of the documents used in the examination were photocopies obtained by the use of "third-party recordkeeper" summonses. See sec. 7609. The revenue agent also testified that the limited number of original documents that he did obtain were returned toPage: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Next
Last modified: May 25, 2011