- 8 - petitioner as shown in his case activity record, copies of pages of which were stipulated by the parties. Petitioner has failed to describe or establish any error or delay by an officer or an employee of the IRS in performing a ministerial act that gave rise to assessments of interest on either deficiencies or payments for his 1990 and 1991 taxable years. The Court therefore holds that respondent’s failure to abate interest was not an abuse of discretion. The Court has considered all other arguments advanced by petitioner, and, to the extent not discussed above, has found those arguments to be irrelevant or without merit. To reflect the foregoing, Decision will be entered for respondent.Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
Last modified: May 25, 2011