Robert B. and Betty D. Harris - Page 36




                                       - 35 -                                         
          and, additionally, in 1995, from respondent’s determination of              
          unreported income.                                                          
               Respondent conceded that petitioners are entitled to                   
          deductions for meals and entertainment expenses totaling $112.45            
          for 1994 and that petitioners did not have unreported income for            
          1995.  Petitioners conceded that, during 1995 and 1996,                     
          petitioner’s tax home was Los Angeles, and, thus, petitioners               
          were not entitled to deduct Los Angeles living expenses for those           
          years.  The remainder of respondent's adjustments at issue for              
          1994, 1995, and 1996 have been sustained.                                   
               Petitioners' evidence was far short of what was required to            
          sustain the disputed adjustments in the notice of deficiency for            
          1994, 1995, and 1996.  Furthermore, petitioners presented no                
          evidence to show that they used due care in claiming deductions             
          on their returns for 1994, 1995, and 1996 that were subsequently            
          adjusted in the notice of deficiency and either conceded by                 
          petitioners or sustained by this Court in favor of respondent,              
          nor did petitioners present evidence to show that they had                  
          reasonable cause to claim such deductions.                                  
               Petitioner failed to maintain adequate books and records to            
          reflect his business expenses for any of the relevant years.                
          Petitioner was an experienced tax return preparer who was, or               
          should have been, abundantly familiar with the substantiation               
          requirements of section 274(d) and the necessity of maintaining             






Page:  Previous  19  20  21  22  23  24  25  26  27  28  29  30  31  32  33  34  35  36  37  38  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011