Earl G. Higbee and Lesley A. Higbee - Page 13




                                       - 13 -                                         
          in a chapter 13 bankruptcy proceeding.5  In support, petitioners            
          submitted to the Court a document entitled “Debtor Receipts and             
          Disbursements Summary” which provides general information about             
          the deposits made by petitioners with the trustee of the                    
          bankruptcy estate and the disbursements to creditors by the                 
          trustee.  As to the bankruptcy-related expenses claimed,                    
          petitioners have failed to provide us with sufficient credible              
          evidence that petitioners had outstanding business debts which              
          were paid while in bankruptcy.  Further, petitioners have failed            
          to explain the origin of these expenses in sufficient detail for            
          us to find that these expenses would be allowable for the tax               
          years in issue.  Petitioners have failed to meet the                        
          substantiation and record-keeping requirements of section                   
          7491(a).  The burden of proof therefore is not placed on                    
          respondent.  Finally, we conclude that petitioners have not met             
          their burden of proof to support the claimed deductions, and                
          therefore we sustain respondent’s determination as to this issue.           
          See Rule 142(a).                                                            
               Petitioners also claim additional Schedule E deductions with           
          regard to their rental activities for repairs ($5,976.31 for 1996           
          and $2,080 for 1997), legal expenses ($5,217 for 1996),                     
          automobile expenses ($475.64 for 1996), and insurance ($139 for             


               5  The claimed deduction of $8,087.26 for 1996 encompasses             
          the $1,920 still in dispute with regard to respondent’s                     
          deficiency determination.                                                   




Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  16  17  18  19  20  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011