Earl G. Higbee and Lesley A. Higbee - Page 20




                                       - 20 -                                         
          production for his determination of the accuracy-related penalty            
          based on negligence or disregard of rules or regulations.                   
          Additionally, with regard to that determination, petitioners have           
          failed to meet their burden of proving that they acted with                 
          reasonable cause and in good faith.  We therefore sustain                   
          respondent’s determination that petitioners are liable for the              
          accuracy-related penalty on the underpayment associated with the            
          disallowed itemized deductions conceded by petitioners.9                    
               In reaching our holdings herein, we have considered all                
          arguments made, and to the extent not mentioned above, we find              
          them to be moot, irrelevant, or without merit.                              
               To reflect the foregoing,                                              
                                             Decision will be entered                 
                                        under Rule 155.                               














               9  Because of respondent’s concessions (see supra p. 4), we            
          conclude that the accuracy-related penalty based on a substantial           
          understatement of tax is not applicable as the understatement               
          does not exceed the greater of 10 percent of tax required to be             
          shown on the return or $5,000.  See sec. 6662(d)(1).                        




Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  16  17  18  19  20  

Last modified: May 25, 2011