- 33 -
served the private interests of its members as opposed to the
interests of the community.
In Sound Health Association v. Commissioner, supra at 182-
183, we utilized the same factors deemed significant by the
Commissioner in granting tax-exempt status to one of two
hospitals under review in Rev. Rul. 69-545, 1969-2 C.B. 117, and
referred to the factors cited favorably in that ruling as the
community benefit test. In Sound Health Association, we
concluded that the subject organization shared several
characteristics with the hospital deemed exempt in Rev. Rul. 69-
545, supra. In particular, like the hospital in the revenue
ruling, Sound Health Association operated a medical clinic and
employed physicians and nurses to provide medical services, and
opened its emergency room to all persons requiring emergency care
whether they were members or not and regardless of whether they
were financially able to pay. Sound Health Association also
established a research program to study health care delivery
systems, conducted a health education program open to the general
public, and was governed by a board of directors the majority of
whom were elected by Sound Health Association members from the
community at large. Sound Health Association v. Commissioner,
supra at 184.
We found that Sound Health Association provided community
benefits beyond those offered by the hospital deemed exempt in
Page: Previous 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 NextLast modified: May 25, 2011