- 111 - consideration when the debtor intended to incur, or believed or reasonably should have believed that he or she would incur, debts beyond his or her ability to pay as they became due. See sec. 726.105(1)(b) (1988). Furthermore, Fla. Stat. section 726.106,35 disregards intent and provides a transfer per se fraudulent where the creditor’s claim arose before the transfer, the transfer lacked valid consideration, and the debtor was insolvent at that time or became insolvent as a result of the transfer. C. Discussion Respondent contends that Frank’s and Katherine’s transfers to Larry, Ronnie, and Sylvia are fraudulent under either Fla. Stat. section 726.01 or FUFTA. For the post-1987 transfers, respondent contends that Larry, Ronnie, and Sylvia are liable as 35 Fla. Stat. sec. 726.106 (1988) provides as follows: 726.106. Transfers fraudulent as to present creditors (1) A transfer made or obligation incurred by a debtor is fraudulent as to a creditor whose claim arose before the transfer was made or the obligation was incurred if the debtor made the transfer or incurred the obligation without receiving a reasonably equivalent value in exchange for the transfer or obligation and the debtor was insolvent at that time or the debtor became insolvent as a result of the transfer or obligation. (2) A transfer made by a debtor is fraudulent as to a creditor whose claim arose before the transfer was made if the transfer was made to an insider for an antecedent debt, the debtor was insolvent at that time, and the insider had reasonable cause to believe that the debtor was insolvent.Page: Previous 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 Next
Last modified: May 25, 2011