- 2 - OPINION OF THE SPECIAL TRIAL JUDGE GOLDBERG, Special Trial Judge: This matter is before the Court on respondent’s Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction. Respondent moved for dismissal on the ground that the petition was not filed within the time period prescribed in section 6213(a) or section 7502. Petitioner, in his objection to respondent’s motion, contends that the petition was deposited in the mail before the expiration of the 90-day period for filing.1 A hearing was held on the motion in Los Angeles, California. Petitioner resided in Beverly Hills, California, at the time the petition was filed. Background In a notice of deficiency dated June 20, 2000, and sent by certified mail on that day, respondent determined a deficiency in petitioner’s Federal income tax of $50,821 for the taxable year 1996. There is no dispute that respondent mailed the notice of deficiency to petitioner’s last known address. The 90-day period for filing a petition with this Court expired on Monday, September 18, 2000, which was not a legal holiday in the District of Columbia. 1 The notice of deficiency was addressed to Irvin Kirschenbaum and Evelyn Kirschenbaum. However, Evelyn Kirschenbaum did not sign the petition to the Tax Court and is not a party in this case.Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Next
Last modified: May 25, 2011