- 6 - incurred in connection with the income. Consequently, we proceed as though petitioner conceded the correctness of the adjustments contained in the notice of deficiency and consider his claim for additional deductions. According to petitioner, he “had a huge amount of business expenses * * * because * * * [he] was a commissioned salesperson”. Petitioner further testified that these expenses would offset the income attributed to him in the notice of deficiency. Petitioner was engaged in one or more trades or businesses during each of the years in issue. In general, a taxpayer is entitled to a deduction for all ordinary and necessary expenses paid or incurred in carrying on the taxpayer’s trade or business. Sec. 162(a). Entitlement to a deduction presupposes that the taxpayer can substantiate by adequate books and records the amount of the deduction claimed. Sec. 6001; sec. 1.6001-1(a), Income Tax Regs. Petitioner’s business records were not made available to the Court. Petitioner claims that his records for the years 1990 through 1996 were confiscated by a storage company because he failed to pay the required storage fees; he claims his records for 1997 and 1998 are in the possession of an accountant who will not return the records until petitioner pays the accountant for services rendered.Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next
Last modified: May 25, 2011