Steven D. and Teresa M. Kucera - Page 16




                                        - 15 -                                        
          general partner of the 1203 Partnership and by the president of             
          the PC.                                                                     
               In contrast to the contracts at issue in In re Estate of               
          Wise, supra, where the Supreme Court of Nebraska determined that            
          a subsequent contract was intended to supplement an earlier                 
          contract, the 1990 agreement makes no reference to any earlier              
          agreements executed between the PC and the 1203 Partnership.  The           
          1990 agreement is complete in and of itself.  As a contract                 
          complete in itself, varying a material term, the 1990 agreement             
          replaces the 1986 agreement.                                                
               The 1203 Partnership’s rental income from the PC during the            
          years in issue, therefore, is not attributable to a written                 
          binding contract entered into before February 19, 1988.                     
               With respect to the three lease agreements between BMS and             
          the 1203 Partnership executed from July 1, 1984, to November 1,             
          1989, petitioners make the same arguments as with the PC rental             
          agreements.  The BMS agreements, however, are distinguishable in            
          that they create month-to-month tenancies.  Each agreement                  
          provides that the term of the lease is from the date on which the           
          agreement was executed and further provides:  “There shall be no            
          ending term and the lease shall be offered by lessor and accepted           
          by lessee from month to month.”                                             
               In some jurisdictions, a month-to-month tenancy is                     
          considered a continuous tenancy, and in some it is considered a             






Page:  Previous  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  16  17  18  19  20  21  22  23  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011