- 5 - Discussion The first issue is whether petitioner is liable for the section 72(t) 10-percent additional tax on the 1997 Denso Plan distribution. As a general rule, if a taxpayer receives any amount from a section 401(k) retirement plan, the taxpayer is liable, in the year of receipt, for a 10-percent additional tax on the portion of the amount which is includable in gross income. Secs. 72(t), 401(a), 4974(c). This general rule is subject to a number of exceptions. See sec. 72(t)(2). In the notice of deficiency, respondent determined that petitioner’s taxable income included no amount from the Denso Plan distribution. Respondent has not sought any increased deficiency resulting from the inclusion of the Denso Plan distribution in petitioner’s gross income and has not otherwise alluded to this issue at trial or on brief. We deem respondent to have conceded that the Denso Plan distribution is not includable in petitioner’s gross income. Accordingly, petitioner is not subject to the 10-percent additional tax on the Denso Plan distribution. The second issue is whether respondent properly determined a deficiency based upon an erroneous refund to petitioner. The jurisdiction of this Court is limited as specifically authorized by statute. See Belloff v. Commissioner, 996 F.2dPage: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next
Last modified: May 25, 2011