- 6 - 36 (1993); Dahlstrom v. Commissioner, 85 T.C. 812, 821 (1985). When a motion for summary judgment is made, the nonmoving party cannot rely upon the allegations or denials in its pleading but must demonstrate with specific facts that there is a genuine issue for trial. King v. Commissioner, 87 T.C. 1213, 1217 (1986); Shepherd v. Commissioner, T.C. Memo. 1997-555. In his petition to this Court, petitioner raises no discernable issues, except to argue generally that he disagreed with the determination of the Appeals officer and that the determination was not complete and was erroneous. The petition states: 1. Petitioner disagrees with the determination under ��6230 and/or 6330 alleged for the year: 1990, 1991, 1992, 1993, and 1994 as set forth in the NOTICE OF DETERMINATION CONCERNING COLLECTION ACTION(S) which is dated FEB. 14, 2001, * * * and NOTICE OF FEDERAL TAX LIEN * * * 2. Petitioner taxpayer identification number is: * * * 3. Petitioner disputes the following: AMOUNT OF ADDITIONS TO TAX/ DEFICIENCY PENALTIES-I.R.C. [interest disputed & Years (disputed) penalties disputed] 1990 $1403.16 $Unknown 1991 $3241.50 $Unknown 1992 $427.57 $Unknown 1993 $1787.47 $Unknown 1994 $3379.82 $Unknown 4. Set forth those adjustments, i.e. changes, in the FINAL NOTICE OF INTENT TO LEVY with which you disagree and why you disagree: Respondent erred in its administrative procedure against petitioner in issuingPage: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 Next
Last modified: May 25, 2011