- 8 - X THE “CLEAN HANDS” DOCTRINE (UNCLEAN HANDS OF RESPONDENT) X ILLEGALITY X FAILURE OF JURISDICTION OVER PETITIONER DISCHARGE IN BANKRUPTCY OTHER________________________________________ A petition filed under section 6330(d)(1)(A) must contain “Clear and concise assignments of each and every error”. Rule 331(b)(4). Further, “clear and concise lettered statements of the facts on which the petitioner bases each assignment of error” must be contained in the petition. Rule 331(b)(5). If any issue is not raised in the petition, it “shall be deemed to be conceded.” Rule 331(b)(4). Further, the prayer for relief shall be set forth in the petition. Rule 331(b)(6). Petitioner was not represented by counsel at the time he filed his petition. Petitioner, nevertheless, has an obligation to comply with the Rules of this Court. The broad and general issues that petitioner raised do not even come close to complying with those Rules.5 In any event, the issues that petitioner presented throughout the proceedings in this case do not raise a genuine issue of material fact. At the Appeals hearing, petitioner attempted to challenge the underlying tax liability. Specifically, petitioner argued 5In his petition, petitioner presents a laundry list of defenses to his tax liability and to the proposed collection activity. Petitioner alleged no facts in support of those defenses in his petition, in the Appeals hearing, or in documents submitted to IRS Appeals or this Court. Our review of the record shows that the defenses pleaded by petitioner have no merit.Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 Next
Last modified: May 25, 2011