Ronald A. Mason - Page 9




                                        - 9 -                                         
               In Browning-Ferris Indus. of Vt., Inc. v. Kelco Disposal,              
          Inc., 492 U.S. 257 (1989), the Supreme Court of the United States           
          held that the Excessive Fines Clause of the Eighth Amendment does           
          not extend to cases between private parties.  See id.  However,             
          it left open the question whether that clause might extend to               
          civil proceedings in which a private party instituted an action             
          in the name of the United States and expects to share in any                
          award of damages.  See id. at 260, 276 n.22.                                
               Regardless of whether Eighth Amendment protection might                
          apply after Browning-Ferris Indus. of Vt., Inc. v. Kelco Dis-               
          posal, Inc., supra, to certain civil proceedings, that protection           
          does not extend to the instant case.  Petitioner’s inability to             
          obtain a refund or a credit of the overpayment that he made for             
          his taxable year 1995 is the result of the operation of law                 
          applied to the facts in this case.  Petitioner made a deliberate            
          decision not to file his 1995 return until March 13, 2000.  He              
          thus knowingly failed to comply with his annual obligation to               
          file his 1995 return, and he now seeks relief because he has lost           
          a refund or a credit for 1995 to which he otherwise would have              
          been entitled.                                                              
               All taxpayers, including petitioner, are bound by the strict           
          terms of the statutory provisions limiting refunds or credits for           
          overpayments.  In the instant case, petitioner decided not to               
          file his 1995 return until March 13, 2000.  In that return, he              






Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  16  17  18  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011