- 18 - ure, the taxpayer contended at trial that “his reasons for failing to file involved an unconfirmed belief that he did not owe any tax, the ‘trauma’ of all his problems and the fact that, unless someone was pressuring him to do something, he did not do it.” Id. We held that those reasons did not constitute reason- able cause for failure to file the returns in question within the meaning of section 6651(a)(1). See id. We find the explanations offered by petitioner here for his failure to file timely his 1996 return and his failure to pay timely his 1996 tax liability to be similar to the excuses offered by the taxpayer in Knight. We rejected those excuses in Knight, and we reject those explana- tions here. On the record before us, we find that petitioner’s failure to file timely his return for 1996 and his failure to pay timely his tax liability for that year were not due to reasonable cause but were due to willful neglect. On the record before us, we find that petitioner is liable for the additions to tax under section 6651(a)(1) and (2). We have considered all of the contentions and arguments of petitioner that are not discussed herein, and we find them to be without merit and/or irrelevant. To reflect the foregoing and the concessions of the parties, Decision will be entered under Rule 155.Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18
Last modified: May 25, 2011