MatrixInfoSys Trust - Page 5




                                        - 5 -                                         
               1.  Res judicata                                                       
               2.  Estoppel                                                           
               3.  Waiver                                                             
               4.  Duress                                                             
               5.  Fraud                                                              
               6.  Statute of limitations                                             
               7.  Invalid notice of deficiency not complying                         
          with the tax code provisions                                                
               8.  Failure of respondent to exhaust administrative                    
          remedies                                                                    
               9.  Laches                                                             
          10.  The “clean hands” doctrine (unclean hands                              
          of respondent)                                                              
          11.  Illegality                                                             
          12.  Failure of jurisdiction over petitioner                                
          13.  Violation of Taxpayer Bill of Rights                                   
               Lastly, petitioner submitted documents in which it appears             
          that he “revokes” and “rescinds” any agreement with the                     
          Government of the United States regarding the Social Security               
          system.  On May 16, 2000, the Court calendared for trial                    
          petitioner’s individual case; the case was placed on the Court’s            
          trial session beginning October 16, 2000, in San Francisco,                 
          California.                                                                 
               C.   Pretrial Discovery and Proceedings                                
               On July 19, 2000, respondent served petitioner with a formal           
          set of interrogatories.  Additionally, on July 19, 2000,                    
          respondent served petitioner with a request for admissions of               
          fact (with attached exhibits) and filed a copy with the Court on            
          July 20, 2000.  On July 31, 2000, petitioner served respondent              
          with his own request for admissions of fact.  On August 29, 2000,           
          petitioner moved this Court to issue a protective order so that             
          he would not have to answer respondent’s interrogatories and                





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011