Medchem (P.R.), Inc. - Page 47




                                       - 47 -                                         
          For purposes of section 936(a), MedChem P.R.’s “ business                   
          presence” in Puerto Rico was insignificant in that it did not               
          contribute significantly to Puerto Rico’s economy either by                 
          creating new jobs or by providing capital to others to build new            
          plants and equipment.  See S. Rept. 94-938, supra at 277-278,               
          1976-3 C.B. (Vol. 3) at 315-316; see also H. Rept. 94-658, supra,           
          1976-3 C.B. (Vol. 2) at 946-947.  All of MedChem P.R.’s business            
          activities after June 30, 1990, were based in Woburn, and                   
          petitioners’ primary connection to Puerto Rico during that time             
          was to further its efforts to move the manufacturing of Avitene             
          to Woburn, where the nonmanufacturing, Avitene-related business             
          and ancillary activities (e.g., financial oversight, sales, and             
          product development) were performed by MedChem U.S.A. employees.            
               Petitioners rely on the fact that title to the non-Japanese-           
          market Avitene passed from MedChem P.R. to MedChem U.S.A. in                
          Puerto Rico.  We do not believe that this fact, standing alone,             
          leads to petitioners’ proffered conclusion that MedChem P.R.                
          actively conducted a trade or business in Puerto Rico throughout            
          the 3-year period.  Indeed, the facts of this case leads us to a            
          contrary conclusion.15  Avitene was manufactured in Puerto Rico             

               14(...continued)                                                       
          in Frank concerned whether the taxpayer actively conducted a                
          trade or business and did not concern where that trade or                   
          business was located.                                                       
               15 Petitioners rely in part on their assertion in brief that           
                                                             (continued...)           





Page:  Previous  37  38  39  40  41  42  43  44  45  46  47  48  49  50  51  52  53  54  55  56  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011