- 14 - the moratorium expired. See CEBA sec. 306(h), 101 Stat. 602, amended by Pub. L. 100-378, sec. 10, 102 Stat. 887, 889 (1988), current version at 12 U.S.C. sec. 1730(d)(1) (1994). The intent of CEBA was to recapitalize the depleted FSLIC. See Branch Banking & Trust Co. v. FDIC, 172 F.3d 317, 320 (4th Cir. 1999). CEBA proved to be ineffective in replenishing the FSLIC’s insurance funds, and, on August 9, 1989, Congress enacted the Financial Institutions Reform, Recovery and Enforcement Act of 1989 (FIRREA), Pub. L. 101-73, 103 Stat. 183, as an emergency measure to prevent the collapse of the savings association industry. See H. Rept. 101-54(I) at 307 (1989); see also H. Conf. Rept. 101-222 at 393 (1989); United States v. Winstar Corp., supra at 856. In relevant part, FIRREA abolished the FSLIC, transferred to the FDIC the responsibility of insuring the deposits at savings associations, and established the BIF and the SAIF. FIRREA gave the FDIC responsibility for regulating both the insurance fund it had traditionally administered (now known as the BIF) and the insurance fund formerly regulated by the FSLIC (now known as the SAIF). See FIRREA secs. 202, 215, 103 Stat. 188, 252. FIRREA imposed on SAIF (as opposed to BIF) participants higher deposit premiums and a higher degree of supervision in an attempt to ensure the SAIF’s strength. See generally 12 U.S.C. sec. 1817 (1994).Page: Previous 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 Next
Last modified: May 25, 2011