Metrocorp, Inc. - Page 16




                                       - 16 -                                         
          default or in danger of default.7  A financial institution that             
          utilized this exception was required to pay an exit fee to the              
          fund that insured the assumed deposit liabilities before the                
          transaction and an entrance fee to the fund that insured the                
          assumed deposit liabilities after the transaction.  See 12 U.S.C.           
          sec. 1815(d)(2)(C), (E) (1994).  Congress provided explicitly               
          that the entrance fee was imposed to prevent dilution of the                
          reserves of the fund that began insuring the assumed deposit                
          liabilities as a result of the transaction.  See H. Rept. 101-              
          54(I), at 325.  The pertinent legislative history does not                  
          contain an explicit explanation of Congress’ intent as to the               
          imposition of the exit fee.                                                 
               Under the second exception to the moratorium, certain                  
          conversion transactions could be consummated through a merger or            
          consolidation (collectively, merger).  See 12 U.S.C.                        
          sec. 1815(d)(3) (1994); see also FIRREA sec. 206(a)(7), 103 Stat.           
          196.  Under this exception, which Metrobank could have utilized             
          to effect the transaction, but decided not to, a bank holding               
          company that controlled a SAIF-insured savings association could            
          generally merge the savings association’s assets and liabilities            
          with a BIF-insured subsidiary.  Because the deposit liabilities             
          of the SAIF-insured institution and a certain percentage of                 



               7 The subject transaction was consummated under this                   
          exception.                                                                  





Page:  Previous  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  16  17  18  19  20  21  22  23  24  25  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011