Metrocorp, Inc. - Page 49




                                       - 49 -                                         
          regulations establish the amount of the exit fee as “the product            
          derived by multiplying the dollar amount of the retained deposit            
          base transferred from the Savings Association Insurance Fund                
          member to the Bank Insurance Fund member by 0.90 percent                    
          (0.0090)”.  12 C.F.R. sec. 312.5(c)(2) (1991).  In pertinent                
          part, the term “retained deposit base” means:                               
               the total deposits transferred from a Savings                          
               Association Insurance Fund Member to a Bank Insurance                  
               Fund Member * * * less the following deposits:                         
                    (1)  Any deposit acquired, directly or indirectly,                
               by or through any deposit broker; and                                  
                    (2) Any portion of any deposit account exceeding                  
               $80,000.                                                               
          12 C.F.R. sec. 312.1(j) (1991).                                             
                    2.  Failure of Petitioner To Establish Purpose of the             
                    Exit Fee                                                          
               There is no clear explanation in FIRREA of the purpose of              
          the exit fee.  Moreover, the majority recognizes:  “The pertinent           
          legislative history does not contain an explicit explanation of             
          Congress’ intent as to the imposition of the exit fee.”  Majority           
          op. p. 16.  Nevertheless, the majority speculates variously that            
          the purpose of the exit fee is “to discourage SAIF-insured                  
          institutions from insuring their deposits with the BIF”, Majority           
          op. p. 15, “to protect the integrity of the SAIF, id. p. 20, and            
          “to compensate the former insurer (in this case, the SAIF) for              
          its future loss of income as to the assumed deposit liabilities”,           
          id. p. 21.  The majority also speculates that the purpose of the            





Page:  Previous  39  40  41  42  43  44  45  46  47  48  49  50  51  52  53  54  55  56  57  58  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011