- 13 - Petitioners produced only two items, two Amway bulletins, one entitled “Bulletin No. 3 Distributorship Inheritance” and one entitled “Bulletin No. 3A Trust”, in support of their position. We find that the Amway activity was not an appreciable asset, and we are also not convinced that petitioners believed that it was such an asset. Sec. 1.183-2(b)(4), Income Tax Regs. Petitioners’ gross income from the sale of Amway products never exceeded their expenses. Petitioners reported total gross income over a 5-year period of $1,509. The $61,159 of Schedule C expenses claimed during the 5 years of their participation in the activity virtually guaranteed that petitioners would not earn a profit. Elliott v. Commissioner, supra at 972; sec. 1.183- 2(b)(6) and (7), Income Tax Regs. Petitioner’s partial explanation for their losses, that their downline distributors “weren’t very motivated” in selling the Amway products, fails to explain adequately the reason for the continuing losses over a period of years. Considering the record in its entirety, we are satisfied that petitioners did not have the actual, honest, and bona fide objective of making a profit. It appears that they became Amway distributors simply to deduct expenses for items of a personal nature. The claimed Schedule C deductions relating to the Amway activity are allowed only to the extent of the gross incomePage: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 Next
Last modified: May 25, 2011