Dudley and Dorothy Moorhous - Page 9




                                        - 9 -                                         
               Section 6330(c) prescribes the matters that may be raised by           
          a taxpayer at an Appeals Office hearing.  In sum, section 6330(c)           
          provides that a taxpayer may raise collection issues such as                
          spousal defenses, the appropriateness of the Commissioner's                 
          intended collection action, and possible alternative means of               
          collection, such as an offer-in-compromise.  Section                        
          6330(c)(2)(B) provides that the existence and amount of the                 
          underlying tax liability can be contested at an Appeals Office              
          hearing only if the taxpayer did not receive a notice of                    
          deficiency for the taxes in question or did not otherwise have an           
          earlier opportunity to dispute such tax liability.  See Sego v.             
          Commissioner, 114 T.C. 604, 609 (2000); Goza v. Commissioner,               
          supra.                                                                      
               Where the Appeals Office issues a determination letter to a            
          taxpayer following an administrative hearing regarding a notice             
          of intent to levy, section 6330(d)(1) provides that the taxpayer            
          will have 30 days following the issuance of such determination              
          letter to file a petition for review with the Tax Court or                  
          Federal District Court.  See Offiler v. Commissioner, 114 T.C.              
          492, 498 (2000).  We have held that the Court’s jurisdiction                
          under sections 6320 and 6330 depends on the issuance of a valid             
          determination letter and the filing of a timely petition for                
          review.  See Meyer v. Commissioner, 115 T.C. 417, 421 (2000);               
          Offiler v. Commissioner, supra at 498.                                      






Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011