- 13 - income of $485,177 and stock-related gain of $2,299,920, both items attributable to husband. We conclude that respondent erred only in that the stock-related gain was $911,795 rather than $2,299,920. Petitioner and husband made a joint return of income for 1986 and, thus, barring relief under section 6015, petitioner is jointly and severally liable for any deficiency in tax resulting from respondent’s adjustments. See sec. 6013(d)(3). B. Embezzlement Income Husband was convicted of tax evasion on account of his failure to report and pay tax for 1986 on income resulting to him from his conversion of the DTC liquidating distribution. DTC had obtained summary judgment against husband in the amount of $496,437.50, which, after garnishment in the amount of $10,259.50, left a balance due of $486,178. There is sufficient evidence for us to find that husband had unreported income in the amount of $485,177 on account of his conversion of the DTC liquidating distribution in 1986.2 See James v. United States, 366 U.S. 213, 220 (1961) (embezzled funds constitute gross income to embezzler in year funds were misappropriated). 2 Respondent’s adjustment for embezzlement income is based on the Aug. 19, 1986, withdrawal of $485,177.37 from the Meritor account.Page: Previous 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 Next
Last modified: May 25, 2011