- 14 - C. Liquidating Dividend 1. Positions of the Parties Respondent has determined that husband failed to report gain of $2,299,920 realized by him in 1986 on account of the distribution by Omni to him of a portion of the proceeds from the sale by Omni of its shares of MagnaCard (the MagnaCard sale). Petitioner does not dispute that, in 1986, husband was owed a $2,299,920 liquidating dividend from Omni on account of the MagnaCard sale. Petitioner argues as follows: In 1986, husband owed to WLJ & Co. (the broker on the MagnaCard sale) $985,000, plus interest (for a total of $1,006,163), which total WLJ & Co. offset against its obligation to disburse to him his portion of the proceeds of the MagnaCard sale. WLJ & Co. discharged the remainder of its obligation to husband by issuing to him its debentures in the amounts of $1,250,000 and $43,751 (the WLJ & Co. debentures). No payments were made on the WLJ & Co. debentures in 1986. WLJ & Co. eventually defaulted on the debentures, and husband received only payments and property worth $250,000. The cost to husband of his Omni stock was $1,388,125.3 3 On brief, petitioner describes RM & Sons as husband’s “alter ego” and treats husband and RM & Sons “as one and the same”. We accept that RM & Sons’ separate identity is to be disregarded, and, therefore, we shall disregard husband’s April 8, 1986 sale of 6,571,201 shares of Omni to RM & Sons for $1,232,100. We shall treat husband as owning directly such shares of Omni. Further references to RM & Sons are to be understood as references to husband.Page: Previous 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 Next
Last modified: May 25, 2011