Phuong K. Nguyen - Page 3




                                        - 3 -                                         
          Background                                                                  
               Petitioner resided in Silver Spring, Maryland, at the time             
          that her petition was filed with the Court.                                 
               Petitioner timely filed a Federal income tax return for the            
          taxable year 1998.  On her return, petitioner listed her filing             
          status as head of household, and she claimed dependency                     
          exemptions and the earned income credit.  Petitioner also claimed           
          a refund of tax in the amount of $2,725.                                    
               By letter dated May 7, 1999 (the examination letter),                  
          respondent’s Service Center in Atlanta, Georgia, informed                   
          petitioner that “We are examining your Federal income tax return            
          for 1998 and find we need documentation to verify certain items.”           
          More specifically, respondent requested that petitioner provide             
          information and documents relating to: (1) Head of household                
          filing status; (2) dependency exemptions; and (3) the earned                
          income credit.                                                              
               Petitioner responded to the examination letter by mailing              
          various documents to respondent.  After reviewing this material,            
          respondent concluded that the information submitted was                     
          insufficient to verify the items under examination.                         
               Thereafter, by letter dated June 10, 1999 (the proposed                
          adjustment letter), respondent proposed a deficiency in                     
          petitioner’s income tax in the amount of $2,225.  The proposed              
          deficiency, which served to reduce the claimed overpayment from             






Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  16  17  18  19  20  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011