Nicole Rose Corp., formerly Quintron Corporation - Page 6


                                        - 6 -                                         
          order to produce the claimed $22 million tax deductions relating            
          thereto.                                                                    

          Background Relating to Leases5                                              
               In 1990, N.V. Brussels Airport Terminal Co. (Brussels                  
          Airport), a Belgium corporation which financed, developed, and              
          managed the Brussels, Belgium, airport, purchased from ABN AMRO             
          Bank, N.V. (ABN), a commercial Dutch bank, certain computer                 
          equipment and leased the equipment back to ABN, which was the end           
          user of the equipment.  Brussels Airport financed the purchase of           


          5    Also in 1990 and later years, in addition to the series of             
          computer equipment leasing transactions, transfers, and payments            
          into trust (relating to what we refer to generally as the                   
          Brussels Airport package of leased equipment) that are                      
          specifically described in our findings of fact, two other series            
          of transactions were entered into involving petitioner, entities            
          controlled by IPG, other domestic entities, and two foreign                 
          entities (namely, N.V. Reilly Chemicals S.A. (Reilly) and                   
          Reibelco S.A. (Reibelco)), that also involved computer equipment            
          leasing transactions, transfers, and payments into trusts, and              
          that generated large ordinary tax deductions claimed by                     
          petitioner, that were disallowed by respondent, and that are at             
          issue herein.                                                               
               At the time of trial, however, none of the documentation               
          relating to the Reilly and to the Reibelco transactions could be            
          located by petitioner.  Because the nature and purpose of the               
          Reilly and Reibelco transactions (for which no documentation is             
          available) are, in all relevant respects, similar to the                    
          transactions involving the Brussels Airport leased equipment                
          described in our findings of fact (for which documentation is               
          available), petitioner and respondent have stipulated that the              
          resolution of the claimed tax deductions in issue relating to the           
          Brussels Airport leased equipment will also control the                     
          resolution of the tax issues relating to the Reilly and Reibelco            
          transactions.  In order properly to reflect the amounts involved            
          that are the basis for petitioner’s claimed $22 million tax                 
          deductions, in our findings and opinion we generally use dollar             
          amounts that reflect cumulative numbers and cumulative dollar               
          amounts for the three series of transactions (i.e., our findings            
          and opinion generally reflect cumulative dollar amounts for the             
          combined Brussels Airport, Reilly, and Reibelco transactions).              



Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  16  17  18  19  20  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011