- 23 - receipts, canceled checks, or other contemporaneous evidence that could aid in the valuation of the contributed property.5 Accordingly, petitioners have not shown that they are entitled to deductions greater than the amounts already claimed during the 1990 and 1991 tax years. Next we consider whether petitioners may claim contributions for unreimbursed expenses incurred by Omega in connection with services performed by Omega employees for the benefit of CBR. Petitioners contend that certain services performed by Omega employees at the behest of petitioners and for the benefit of CBR entitle petitioners to deduct as passthrough charitable contributions the salaries paid in connection with services performed. Respondent argues that petitioners are not entitled to a deduction for the salaries paid to Omega employees for work performed on the ranch because the work benefited Omega. There are in dispute charitable “cash contributions”6 of $121,149, $76,711, and $95,016 for the tax years 1993, 1994, and 1995, respectively. Aside from petitioner’s self-serving testimony, petitioners submitted a schedule showing some of the pay periods during the years in issue; however, the schedule is 5 Petitioners’ only receipt was for a mobile home with a purchase date of June 13, 1983, at a price of $19,500. It is not known whether this mobile home was an item contributed to Christian Boys Ranch, Inc. (CBR). 6 In effect, these are gifts of services as opposed to cash contributed to CBR.Page: Previous 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Next
Last modified: May 25, 2011