- 8 - to pay tax deficiencies over a tax shelter that she viewed as fraudulent. Her actions in not filing proper tax returns were nothing more than acts of civil disobedience. Her pleadings, as noted above, were frivolous and consumed the time and efforts of this Court. Moreover, her testimony to the Court that the only relief she sought was the recusal of respondent's attorney evinced an intent to delay this proceeding and its ultimate conclusion. The Court holds that petitioner is liable for the penalty under section 6673 and imposes such penalty in the amount of $750. Because of respondent's concessions, Decision will be entered under Rule 155.Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
Last modified: May 25, 2011