Jerry S. Payne - Page 2




                                        - 2 -                                         
               Unless otherwise indicated, all section references are to              
          the Internal Revenue Code in effect for the years in issue, and             
          all Rule references are to the Tax Court Rules of Practice and              
          Procedure.                                                                  
               After concessions, the primary issue for decision is whether           
          respondent’s position in Payne v. Commissioner, T.C. Memo. 1998-            
          227, revd. 224 F.3d 415 (5th Cir. 2000), as to the tax                      
          deficiencies and the fraud additions to tax was substantially               
          justified.                                                                  

                                     Background                                       
               During 1987 and 1988, petitioner practiced law, and                    
          petitioner owned and operated in Houston, Texas, a law firm under           
          the name of Payne & Associates.  Petitioner provided extensive              
          legal representation to and eventually managed, controlled, and             
          owned the stock of 2618, Inc. (2618 Inc.), a corporation that               
          owned and operated a topless dance club in Houston, Texas, under            
          the name Caligula XXI (the Club).                                           
               Petitioner received funds relating to various transactions             
          involving 2618 Inc., the Club, and other entities and activities.           
          Those funds were generally deposited into petitioner’s bank                 
          accounts.  Portions of those funds were then disbursed from                 
          petitioner’s bank accounts for and on behalf of 2618 Inc. and the           
          Club; other portions of the funds were used by petitioner for his           
          personal purposes.                                                          





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011