Jerry S. Payne - Page 3




                                        - 3 -                                         
               During 1987 and 1988, petitioner failed to maintain adequate           
          books and records for his law firm, and adequate books and                  
          records were not maintained for 2618 Inc. and for the Club.                 
               On audit, respondent determined that petitioner failed to              
          establish and to substantiate the nature and amount of                      
          petitioner’s income and expenses claimed on his 1987 and 1988               
          Federal income tax returns.                                                 
               Due to the inadequacy of petitioner’s books and records,               
          respondent reconstructed petitioner’s taxable income for 1987 and           
          1988 using the specific item and the bank deposits methods of               
          proof.  Respondent determined significant increases to                      
          petitioner’s income over that reported on petitioner’s 1987 and             
          1988 Federal income tax returns, disallowed many claimed business           
          and itemized deductions, made other adjustments, and charged                
          petitioner with the fraud additions to tax for each year.                   
               In our prior Memorandum Opinion, Payne v. Commissioner, T.C.           
          Memo. 1998-227, we sustained in significant part respondent’s               
          deficiency determinations, and we concluded that petitioner was             
          liable for the fraud additions to tax for 1987 and 1988.                    
               On appeal, in Payne v. Commissioner, 224 F.3d 415 (5th Cir.            
          2000), the Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit concluded that            
          respondent did not satisfy his clear and convincing burden of               
          proof applicable to the fraud additions to tax, and (because                
          absent fraud the period of limitations for assessment of the tax            






Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011