- 11 - service business.8 Based on our examination of the entire record before us, we find that petitioners have failed to prove that they are entitled for 1993 to deduct under section 162(a) $2,883 of their claimed Schedule C expenses for “Repairs and maintenance” that remain at issue or any other amount in excess of that conceded by respon- dent. With respect to the deductions for 1993 totaling $6,205 claimed in Schedule C for depreciation, respondent concedes that petitioners are entitled under section 167(a) to deduct $2,055. However, respondent contends that petitioners are not entitled to deduct the remaining amount (i.e., $4,150) of claimed Schedule C depreciation. Section 167(a) allows a deduction for a reasonable allowance for the exhaustion, wear and tear, and obsolescence of property used in a trade or business or held for the production of income. The basis on which a depreciation deduction is allowable with respect to any property under section 167(a) is the adjusted basis of the property, determined under section 1011 for the purpose of determining gain on the sale or other disposi- tion of such property. See sec. 167(c). Petitioners introduced no evidence to support the $4,150 of claimed Schedule C deprecia- 8We also find on the record presented that petitioners have failed to establish that the $5,020.68 of expenses that the documentary evidence introduced at trial establishes they paid did not include amounts of expenses conceded by respondent as deductible Schedule C expenses.Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 Next
Last modified: May 25, 2011