- 20 - necessary to establish the reasonableness of the deduction for “losses incurred.” [Sec. 1.832-4(a)(5) and (b), Income Tax Regs.] Petitioner does not dispute the validity of the applicable regulations but argues that they must be construed so as to accord deference to the unpaid loss estimates reflected on the taxpayer’s annual statement, provided the taxpayer has used “good faith business judgment” in preparing those estimates. Petitioner’s contention is at bottom a rehashing of long-rejected arguments that the Code reflects a congressional expectation that the estimates of unpaid losses used for tax purposes should conform to the precise figures shown on the annual statement. In rejecting such arguments and upholding the validity of the applicable regulations, the Court of Appeals for the First Circuit stated: Congress’s requirement that the N.A.I.C. [annual statement] form be followed as the only acceptable method for computing an insurance company’s gross income * * * [provides] no support * * * for the contention that the mere inclusion of certain figures on the congressionally-approved annual statement can prevent the Commissioner’s adjustment for the purpose of identifying tax deficiencies. * * * [Hanover Ins. Co. v. Commissioner, 598 F.2d 1211, 1217 (1st Cir. 1979), affg. 69 T.C. 260, 272 (1977).] The Court of Appeals for the First Circuit noted that accepting such a contention would be “tantamount to a sanctification of the estimated figures as well as the form itself, no matter how unfair or unreasonable.” Id. (quoting Hanover Ins. Co. v. Commissioner, 65 T.C. 715, 719 (1976)); see also Pac. EmployersPage: Previous 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 Next
Last modified: May 25, 2011