Zinovy V. Reytblatt and Natalia B. Romalis-Reytblatt - Page 3




                                        - 3 -                                         
          and (7) petitioners were entitled to a deduction of $3,000 for a            
          long-term capital loss.                                                     
               At the initial hearing petitioner contended that a payment             
          to the Internal Revenue Service in November2 1996 of $2,524 had             
          been made by his wife for the taxable year 1994 and that that               
          amount should have been credited to the 1996 liability.  It                 
          appears that changes were made to petitioners’ 1994 tax liability           
          resulting in an underpayment against which a $2,524 payment was             
          made in 1996 and applied to the 1994 liability.  The Court                  
          explained at that time that the taxable year 1994 was not before            
          the Court.  When petitioner later renewed this issue, the Court             
          pointed out that the 1996 taxable year had not closed at the time           
          of the payment and a liability for that year had not even been              
          determined.                                                                 
               The case was continued for trial to the Special Session of             
          the Court commencing May 17, 2001, in Hartford, Connecticut.  On            
          March 23, 2001, Ms. O’Connor filed a motion to withdraw as                  
          counsel.  That motion was granted on March 30, 2001.                        
               Subsequently, petitioner, proceeding pro se, sent various              
          documents3 to the Court:                                                    



               2  It is unclear whether the payment was made in September             
          or November, but the exact date does not appear to be material.             
               3  Some of the documents received from petitioner have not             
          been filed and will be placed in the Court’s correspondence file.           





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011