- 7 -
statement made in settlement negotiations by Mr. Evans would be
inadmissible. See Fed. R. Evid. 408. Our deposition process
should not be used as a harassment device. Accordingly, we deny
petitioner’s motions for reconsideration of our order quashing
the subpoena and the denial of petitioner’s motion for sanctions.
It appears that our ruling with respect to the alleged
travel expenses and the stipulation of facts resolves all the
issues properly before this Court in favor of respondent.
An appropriate order and order
of dismissal and decision will be
entered.
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7
Last modified: May 25, 2011