Zinovy V. Reytblatt and Natalia B. Romalis-Reytblatt - Page 7




                                        - 7 -                                         
          statement made in settlement negotiations by Mr. Evans would be             
          inadmissible.  See Fed. R. Evid. 408.  Our deposition process               
          should not be used as a harassment device.  Accordingly, we deny            
          petitioner’s motions for reconsideration of our order quashing              
          the subpoena and the denial of petitioner’s motion for sanctions.           
               It appears that our ruling with respect to the alleged                 
          travel expenses and the stipulation of facts resolves all the               
          issues properly before this Court in favor of respondent.                   


                                             An appropriate order and order           
                                        of dismissal and decision will be             
                                        entered.                                      



























Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  

Last modified: May 25, 2011