John Y. & Marion Robnett - Page 14




                                       - 14 -                                         
          controversy involved.  See Schirmer v. Commissioner, 89 T.C. 277,           
          285-286 (1987).  Petitioners argue that the deduction was clearly           
          indicated on the return.  Merely claiming the loss, without                 
          further explanation, was not sufficient to alert respondent to              
          the controversial section 174 deduction of which the partnership            
          loss consisted.                                                             
               Finally, section 6661(c) provides the Secretary with the               
          discretion to waive the section 6661(a) addition to tax if the              
          taxpayer shows he acted with reasonable cause and in good faith.            
          We review the Secretary’s failure to waive the addition to tax              
          for abuse of discretion.  See Martin Ice Cream Co. v.                       
          Commissioner, 110 T.C. 189, 235 (1998).  Petitioners argue that             
          they acted in good faith and reasonably relied upon Mr. Meinke in           
          claiming the loss.  However, nothing in the record indicates                
          petitioners requested a waiver for good faith and reasonable                
          cause under section 6661(c).  In the absence of such a request,             
          we cannot review respondent’s determination for an abuse of                 
          discretion.  See id.                                                        
               Because petitioners did not have substantial authority for             
          their treatment of the partnership loss and did not adequately              
          disclose the relevant facts of that treatment, we uphold                    
          respondent on this issue.                                                   
               The third issue for decision is whether this Court has                 
          jurisdiction to review the section 6621(c) tax-motivated interest           






Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  16  17  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011