Stephen J. Roling and Peggy A. Roling - Page 4




                                        - 3 -                                         
               Petitioners resided in Bellevue, Iowa, at the time they                
          filed their petition.                                                       
          The Examination                                                             
               Timber Expenditures                                                    
               Stephen Roling (petitioner) operates a logging business as a           
          sole proprietor.  As part of his business petitioner enters into            
          "right to cut" contracts with landowners.  The contracts allow              
          petitioner to enter onto the land to cut specifically identified            
          trees within a certain time frame, usually from 12 to 15 months.            
          Petitioner does not actually cut the timber until he has a buyer            
          for it.  The buyer, a lumber mill, picks up the cut trees from              
          the landowner's property.                                                   
               Typically, petitioner makes a payment of 20 percent of the             
          contract price (downpayment) at the time the contract is signed,            
          and the balance is paid at the time the timber is cut.  The                 
          landowner retains ownership of the trees until the contract is              
          paid in full.  Petitioner, a cash basis taxpayer, deducted the              
          downpayments on the contracts to cut in the year the payments               
          were made.                                                                  
               Upon examination of petitioners' Federal income tax return             
          for 1994, the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) determined that                
          petitioners' contract downpayments were not currently deductible.           
          It was respondent's position at the examination that the contract           
          payments must be capitalized into "inventory" to match                      






Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  16  17  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011