Stephen J. Roling and Peggy A. Roling - Page 10




                                        - 9 -                                         
          Commissioner, 108 T.C. 430, 443 (1997) (quoting Pierce v.                   
          Underwood, supra at 566 n.2).                                               
               The relevant inquiry is "whether the Commissioner knew or              
          should have known that * * * [his] position was invalid at the              
          onset".  Nalle v. Commissioner, 55 F.3d 189, 191 (5th Cir. 1995),           
          affg. T.C. Memo. 1994-182.  We look to whether the Commissioner's           
          position was reasonable given the available facts and                       
          circumstances at the time that the Commissioner took his                    
          position.  See Maggie Management Co. v. Commissioner, supra at              
          443; DeVenney v. Commissioner, 85 T.C. 927, 930 (1985).                     
               The fact that the Commissioner eventually concedes, or even            
          loses, a case does not establish that his position was                      
          unreasonable.  See Estate of Perry v. Commissioner, 931 F.2d                
          1044, 1046 (5th Cir. 1991); Sokol v. Commissioner, 92 T.C. 760,             
          767 (1989).  However, the Commissioner's concession remains a               
          factor to be considered.  See Powers v. Commissioner, 100 T.C.              
          457, 471 (1993), affd. in part, revd. in part and remanded on               
          another issue 43 F.3d 172 (5th Cir. 1995).                                  
               As relevant herein, the position of the United States that             
          must be examined against the substantial justification standard             
          with respect to the recovery of administrative costs is the                 
          position taken by the Commissioner as of the date of the notice             
          of deficiency.  See sec. 7430(c)(7)(B).  The position of the                
          United States that must be examined in light of the substantial             






Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  16  17  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011