- 15 - OPINION The Internal Revenue Code imposes a Federal estate tax on the transfer of the taxable estate of a decedent who is a citizen or resident of the United States. Secs. 2001 and 2002. Section 2053(a)(3) allows a deduction from the gross estate for claims against the estate that are allowable by the laws of the jurisdiction under which the estate is administered. The issue for decision in the instant case is the value of Exxon’s claim against the estate as of decedent’s date of death for purposes of determining the amount of the estate’s section 2053(a)(3) deduction. Burden of Proof Before the trial on remand, the estate filed a Motion to Place Burden of Proof on Respondent. The estate argued that the Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit rejected respondent’s presumption of correctness and that the burden had shifted to respondent to prove the existence and amount of the deficiency. We denied the estate’s motion prior to the trial on remand. The Court of Appeals said nothing about rejecting respondent’s presumption of correctness. Rather, the Court of Appeals said: “it is incumbent on each party to supply the Tax Court with relevant evidence of predeath facts and occurrences supporting the value of the Exxon claim advocated by that party.” Estate of Smith v. Commissioner, supra at 526. As explainedPage: Previous 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 Next
Last modified: May 25, 2011