Estate of Algerine Allen Smith - Page 18




                                       - 18 -                                         
          estate is not entitled to deduct the full amount that was being             
          claimed by Exxon at Decedent’s death.”   Id. at 521.  Rather, the           
          estate argues that this language was not necessary to the Court             
          of Appeals’s decision, and, therefore, the court’s instructions             
          on valuing the claim constitute dicta.                                      
               Under the law of the case doctrine, the decision of a legal            
          issue by an appellate court establishes the law of the case and             
          must be followed in all subsequent proceedings in the same case             
          at both the trial and appellate levels.  Christianson v. Colt               
          Indus. Op. Corp., 486 U.S. 800, 816 (1988); Reid v. Rolling Fork            
          Pub. Util. Dist., 979 F.2d 1084, 1086 (5th Cir. 1992); Pollei v.            
          Commissioner, 94 T.C. 595, 601 (1990).  The issues the lower                
          court is precluded from considering include those that were                 
          decided by the appellate court expressly or by necessary                    
          implication.  Browning v. Navarro, 887 F.2d 553, 556 (5th Cir.              
          1989); Pollei v. Commissioner, supra.  The trial court on remand            
          must follow the appellate court’s mandate, and it is guided and             
          confined by that court’s decree and direction.  Pollei v.                   
          Commissioner, supra at 602.                                                 
               The parties agree that Exxon was seeking $2,482,719 from               
          decedent at the time of her death.  However, contrary to the                
          estate’s argument, the Court of Appeals did not find that Exxon’s           
          claim was enforceable to the extent of this amount.  Rather, the            
          Court of Appeals found that the amount of the estate’s section              






Page:  Previous  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  16  17  18  19  20  21  22  23  24  25  26  27  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011