- 26 - In addition to the report and testimony of Mr. Glasser, other evidence indicates that the value of Exxon’s claim as of decedent’s date of death was significantly less than the amount Exxon was seeking from decedent. We note the contents of the Form 706, signed by decedent on March 21, 1990, under penalties of perjury, and filed by decedent in her capacity as executrix of Frankie’s estate. The Form 706 with its accompanying schedules and statements, including Mr. Kuhlmann’s letter that was attached to the Form 706, indicates that Exxon was willing to settle its claim against all the Allen parties for $944,280. Despite the fact that the Allen parties rejected this offer, presumably because they thought Exxon’s proposal was too high, decedent, as executrix for Frankie’s estate, deducted the amount of Exxon’s offer of $944,280 to settle claims against all of the Allen parties. The full amount of Exxon’s claim against Frankie was $1,888,777. The parties agree that Exxon was seeking $2,482,719 from decedent at the time of her death. This amount included amounts sought from Jessamine’s and Frankie’s interests, which decedent had inherited. Thus, Exxon’s counteroffer was approximately 38 percent of the total amount it was seeking from the Allen parties.13 This counteroffer by Exxon to the Allen parties was 13944,280 � 2,482,719 = .3803.Page: Previous 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 Next
Last modified: May 25, 2011