Sybil M. Smith - Page 8




                                        - 8 -                                         
                         allocated to individuals filing the return in                
                         the same manner as it would have been                        
                         allocated if the individuals had filed                       
                         separate returns for the taxable year.                       
                              (B) Exception where other spouse                        
                         benefits.--Under rules prescribed by the                     
                         Secretary, an item otherwise allocable to an                 
                         individual under subparagraph (A) shall be                   
                         allocated to the other individual filing the                 
                         joint return to the extent the item gave rise                
                         to a tax benefit on the joint return to the                  
                         other individual.                                            
                           *    *    *    *    *    *    *                            
                    (f) Equitable Relief.--Under procedures prescribed                
               by the Secretary, if–-                                                 
                         (1) taking into account all the facts and                    
                    circumstances, it is inequitable to hold the                      
                    individual liable for any unpaid tax or any                       
                    deficiency (or any portion of either); and                        
                         (2) relief is not available to such                          
                    individual under subsection (b) or (c),                           
               the Secretary may relieve such individual of such                      
               liability.  [Emphasis added.]                                          
               Petitioner requests that we find:  (1) That the underpayment           
          for 1987 and the deficiency for 1992 are entirely attributable              
          and allocable to H. Smith and (2) that she was abused emotionally           
          and physically by a spouse who kept her ignorant of their tax               
          liabilities, based on her uncorroborated conclusory testimony in            
          response to leading questions.  The unsatisfactory quality of               
          petitioner’s testimony is shown by the following excerpts:                  
                    Q  [By petitioner’s counsel]  And during the time                 
               that you were married to Mr. Smith did he ever abuse                   
               you emotionally or physically?                                         






Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011