Hilton Lee Strickland - Page 3




                                        - 3 -                                         
          On the same day, petitioner requested the referenced hearing                
          before the Internal Revenue Service Office of Appeals (Appeals).            
          Petitioner stated in his request that “I relied on the advice of            
          a tax return professional who had given me wrong information.  I            
          do not owe the taxes which are now being billed to me.”                     
               Appeals assigned petitioner’s request for a hearing to                 
          Settlement Officer Roger Cable, an Appeals officer, and Mr. Cable           
          sent the case to Michael Generazio, a revenue agent in the Holly            
          Hill examination office, for the purpose of holding the hearing.1           
          Mr. Generazio held the hearing with petitioner in Holly Hill; as            
          respondent’s counsel explained at trial, “there wasn’t an appeals           
          officer there that could meet with Petitioner for the due process           
          matter, but –- so he was referred to an examiner there, who he              
          did meet with.”  Following the hearing, Mr. Cable telephoned                
          petitioner to notify him that Mr. Generazio had concluded that              
          petitioner’s Federal income tax liabilities (overpayments) for              
          1995, 1996, and 1997 were:                                                  
                              Year    Liability/(overpayments)                        
                              1995           1($129.74)                               
                              1996          10,525.56                                 
                              1997          (1,973.66)                                
          8,422.16                                                                    
                    1 This amount was primarily (if not entirely)                     
               attributable to interest payable by petitioner with                    
               respect to that year’s taxes.                                          


               1 The revenue agent who recommended the levy was also                  
          assigned to respondent’s Holly Hill examination office.                     





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011