- 3 - On the same day, petitioner requested the referenced hearing before the Internal Revenue Service Office of Appeals (Appeals). Petitioner stated in his request that “I relied on the advice of a tax return professional who had given me wrong information. I do not owe the taxes which are now being billed to me.” Appeals assigned petitioner’s request for a hearing to Settlement Officer Roger Cable, an Appeals officer, and Mr. Cable sent the case to Michael Generazio, a revenue agent in the Holly Hill examination office, for the purpose of holding the hearing.1 Mr. Generazio held the hearing with petitioner in Holly Hill; as respondent’s counsel explained at trial, “there wasn’t an appeals officer there that could meet with Petitioner for the due process matter, but –- so he was referred to an examiner there, who he did meet with.” Following the hearing, Mr. Cable telephoned petitioner to notify him that Mr. Generazio had concluded that petitioner’s Federal income tax liabilities (overpayments) for 1995, 1996, and 1997 were: Year Liability/(overpayments) 1995 1($129.74) 1996 10,525.56 1997 (1,973.66) 8,422.16 1 This amount was primarily (if not entirely) attributable to interest payable by petitioner with respect to that year’s taxes. 1 The revenue agent who recommended the levy was also assigned to respondent’s Holly Hill examination office.Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Next
Last modified: May 25, 2011