Hilton Lee Strickland - Page 6




                                        - 6 -                                         
                    under this section before such levy is made.                      
                    * * *                                                             
                         *    *    *    *    *    *    *                              
                    (b) Right to Fair Hearing.--                                      
                         (1) In general.--If the person requests                      
                    a hearing * * *, such hearing shall be held                       
                    by the Internal Revenue Service Office of                         
                    Appeals.                                                          
               Pursuant to the Court’s holding in Lunsford v. Commissioner,           
          117 T.C.     (2001) (Lunsford II), we confine our analysis solely           
          to the issues raised in the petition.  The only issue that we               
          understand petitioner to have raised in the petition concerns               
          either:  (1) The amount and/or existence of the underlying tax              
          liability for 1996 (the only year in issue with a liability) or             
          (2) an offer to compromise the $8,422.16 by paying nothing.                 
          Pursuant to Lunsford II, we consider petitioner to have abandoned           
          all other allegations of error which he might have set forth in             
          this petition, including, in particular, any allegation that his            
          hearing with the revenue agent was improper by virtue of the fact           
          that section 6330(b)(1) requires explicitly that a “hearing                 
          [under section 6330] shall be held by the Internal Revenue                  
          Service Office of Appeals.”                                                 
               As to the first of the two issues possibly raised in the               
          petition, it is well settled in this Court that the taxpayer                
          cannot challenge the amount and/or existence of an underlying tax           
          liability where the taxpayer receives a notice of deficiency.               






Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011