Gerald Dennis Strong - Page 13




                                       - 13 -                                         
               When petitioner filed the 1994 joint tax return, on October            
          16, 1995, both petitioner and Mary intended to file a 1994 joint            
          tax return.                                                                 
          C.  The Bankruptcy Proceeding                                               
               On December 18, 1997, petitioner filed a petition for                  
          bankruptcy under chapter 13 of the Bankruptcy Code in the U.S.              
          Bankruptcy Court for the District of Maryland, Southern Division.           
          Petitioner’s case was later converted to a case under chapter 7.            
          Laura J. Margulies (hereinafter sometimes referred to as                    
          Margulies), a bankruptcy attorney, represented petitioner in that           
          bankruptcy case.                                                            
               Respondent6 filed claims for taxes, including claims for               
          income taxes for 1988, 1989, 1990, 1991, and 1994, in                       
          petitioner’s Bankruptcy Court proceeding.                                   
               Petitioner objected to respondent’s claim.  As to 1994, he             
          contended that he did not have any tax liability, that he had               
          overpaid his 1994 taxes by $54,729, and that this overpayment had           
          already been applied to his 1988 tax liability.  Petitioner                 
          argued in the bankruptcy case that income received from NHP in              
          1994 and the disability payments from Metro-Life were excludable            
          from gross income under the provisions of section 104(a)(2).  The           
          Bankruptcy Court conducted a hearing on respondent’s claims and             

               6For simplicity and ease, we use the term respondent to                
          include the U.S. Government, which was the party in the                     
          bankruptcy action.                                                          





Page:  Previous  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  16  17  18  19  20  21  22  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011