Will L. and Rachel A. Thomas - Page 3




                                        - 3 -                                         

          from the Hartford Life Insurance Co.  These benefits were from a            
          health and accident plan provided by petitioner's former                    
          employer.                                                                   
               On their Federal income tax return for 1997, petitioners               
          included as income the wages earned by Mrs. Thomas, the Hartford            
          Insurance Co. benefits, taxable interest income, and unemployment           
          compensation benefits.  On lines 20a and 20b of the Form 1040,              
          U.S. Individual Income Tax Return, for Social Security benefits,            
          no amounts were entered as income.  However, the following line             
          21, Other Income, included a typed notation: "TP claims exemption           
          on Disa", and the amount of $1 was entered as income.3                      
               In the notice of deficiency, respondent determined that the            
          disability Social Security benefits were subject to tax under               
          section 86 and determined that $8,876 of those benefits was                 
          includable in gross income.  No other adjustments were made by              
          respondent to petitioners' 1997 return.                                     
               Petitioners contend that the disability Social Security                
          benefits are a health and accident insurance benefit under                  





               3    Although petitioners did not address this entry at                
          trial, the Court surmises that the term "Disa" on line 21 of the            
          return was an intended synonym for disability income Social                 
          Security benefits.  Since petitioners contend that such benefits            
          are excludable from income, no explanation was advanced as to why           
          petitioners considered $1 of such benefits includable in gross              
          income as reported on line 21 of the return.                                




Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011