James Tinnell - Page 36




                                       - 36 -                                         
                    8.  Petitioner’s Financial Status                                 
               That the taxpayer does not have substantial income or                  
          capital from sources other than the activity in question may                
          indicate that the activity is engaged in for profit.  See sec.              
          1.183-2(b)(8), Income Tax Regs.  Substantial income from sources            
          other than the activity (especially if the losses from the                  
          activity generate substantial tax benefits) may indicate a lack             
          of profit motive, particularly where there are elements of                  
          personal pleasure or recreation involved.  See id.                          
               Respondent argues that little financial pressure or                    
          incentive existed to pursue work that was consistently profitable           
          because petitioner could fund his mining activities with the                
          royalties he received from Zila and with the proceeds from the              
          sale of Zila stock.23  Petitioner contends that the tax benefits            
          he realized were relatively small in comparison to the out-of-              
          pocket expenditures he made and that his financial commitment to            
          his mining activity confirms his intention to make a profit from            
          the activity.                                                               
               Petitioner’s income from Zila royalties and stock was                  
          substantial during the years at issue; however, petitioner                  
          invested a substantial portion of that money each year in his               
          mining activities.  Petitioner financed his mining activity with            


               23With respect to his medical practice, however, petitioner            
          did not earn more than $36,723 in any year from 1989 through                
          1998, and he sustained losses in 3 of those years.                          





Page:  Previous  26  27  28  29  30  31  32  33  34  35  36  37  38  39  40  41  42  43  44  45  Next

Last modified: May 25, 2011